-->
Whatever I FancyWhatever I Fancy BlogWhatever I Fancy

incorporating
Climate Blog Climate Blog UK Climate Blog

and remembering
Coronavirus Blog Coronavirus Blog UK Coronavirus Blog
Comment | Opinion | Questions

Go to Charlie Lewis website collection home page

Stand by Ukraine! Ceasefire for Gaza!

[Entries are in reverse date order, latest at the top. Comm­ents and cont­ri­but­ions are wel­come to the em­ail add­ress at the bot­tom.]


Tuesday 22th April



In this picture there's a bloke in a yellow vest, black shorts, red-striped socks, next to a water bottle - just above and left of centre - who's looking a bit grumpy. He could be me - not all the time, but now and again. I'll explain.

I've recently strung together a few visits to the gym. I'm not convinced it's doing me any good, but I'm going to give it a few months. It can't harm me to move a bit more. I enjoy the podcasts.

It's been relatively quiet this last week and I've not had any difficulty getting to the equipment I need. Half-term. On regular school days, if I arrive after 3 pm, the place is packed; it really does look like the scene in the picture. Boys and girls, mostly in their mid-teens, sometimes even younger. Grouped round machines, chatting, on their mobile phones, taking turns, but often not doing much - just hanging out. Infuriating when you can't get at the device you want. As I'm retired, I could go in the morning, but I don't feel ready for exercise at that time.

So, for the second time in two weeks, I'm gratified to discover a Guardian newspaper article that reflects and confirms a phemonenon I've seen with my own eyes:



Skinny boys and fit girls. I'm not sure why the latter are there, as they look in very good shape. The boys must be trying to bulk up, I presume so that they have a better chance of attracting the girls. The headline sub-text hints at the secondary motive:



David Minton, the founder of Leisure Database, a specialist fitness market analysis firm, says:


"Gen Z are also going to the gym in order to meet a romantic partner and to increase their network of friends because, while they spend a lot of time on social media, the gym offers an in-person experience rather than a virtual experience. For them, gym-going is all about the social element. It's not about losing weight, because most of them don't need to."

At my gym in Stroud's Stratford Park Leisure Centre, the boys and girls most­ly don't mix. But there's an occ­as­ion­al pair who have made the break­through and ex­er­cise to­geth­er. I wit­nessed a couple yest­er­day who only just man­aged, in the in­ter­est of gym dec­or­um, to keep their hands off each other.

Here's the Guardian article: The Guardian: GenZ and the gym

Monday 21st April

Private Eye cover: click to enlarge

Saturday 19th April

Another age-related post.



I was pleased to see this headline in The Guardian last Monday:



We all hear the warnings about heavy use of com­put­ers and smart­phones, of being glued to a screen. We def­in­ite­ly know the dan­gers of soc­ial media - Ad­ol­esc­ence, right? - and ob­sess­ive doom­scroll­ing. But that's for the young. We've dis­cussed with our daugh­ter Ellie the con­cerns and risks for 10-year-old grand­son Marlie.

I've been involved professionally with computers for over 40 years and my ex­per­ience has been the opp­os­ite. I've never played com­put­er games - well, not since Pac-Man, and I may have dabb­led with Sol­it­aire with the app­ear­ance of Win­dows 3.0 in 1990. The per­son­al com­puter, which I dis­cov­ered along with many others in the early eight­ies, has always been a tool to me, not a play­thing. The word­pro­cess­or trans­formed my life. When I wrote ess­ays at school, I often be­came dis­sat­is­fied with my eff­orts after many pain­ful hours and pages and had to start again, hand-written. The ab­il­ity to save and edit was a bless­ed rel­ease. I talked of this yest­er­day with my friend Ger­ald­ine, and learnt that she felt the same when she came across a Mac for the first time, found the creat­iv­ity it rel­eased.

Dr Michael Scullin, cognitive neuroscientist at Baylor University in Texas, an­al­ysed 57 pub­lished stud­ies that ex­am­ined the use of dig­it­al tech­nol­ogy in 411,430 adults around the world. The av­er­age age was 69 years old and all had a cog­nit­ive test or diag­nos­is. He said:


"Using digital devices in the way that we use televisions - passive and sedentary, both physically and mentally - is not likely to be beneficial. But our computers and smartphones also can be mentally stimulating, afford social connections, and provide compensation for cognitive abilities that are declining with ageing. These latter types of uses have long been regarded as beneficial for cognitive ageing."

In contrast to the tales of tiredness and other woes often associated with lengthy screen work, I've always - oddly - felt energised by a successful stint at the keyboard. I suspect it's the active engagement, the problem-solving, the profitable following of rules to achieve a desired end. The mind kept nimble by the skills required even at a basic level, like the HTML work needed to present this webpage.

Sam Gilbert, professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London, said:


"We cannot be sure whether technology usage itself preserves cognitive ability, whether preserved cognitive ability leads to more frequent use of technology, or - most likely - some combination of the two. Nevertheless, this work challenges alarmist ideas about so-called 'digital dementia' and instead suggests that using digital technology can be good for brain health."

I'm happy to hear, for the first time, that my hours at the computer have been doing me good.

Here's the Guardian piece: The Guardian: Older people who use smartphones 'have lower rates of cognitive decline'

Friday 18th April

An age-related post today.

One of the big turn-ons for Trump is to have people crawl to him, "kissing my ass". [An image I'm now trying hard to forget.] Italian PM Meloni was with him yesterday, the latest in a long line of political leaders beating a path to the White House. Few people, other than Anders Vistisen, Danish member of the European Parliament ("Mr Trump, f*** off"), and of course the Chinese government, are bold enough to stand up to the orange bully.

One notable exception is Bernie Sanders, United States sen­at­or from Ver­mont. I've had little sense of coun­ter-Trump pub­lic pro­test since in­aug­ur­at­ion, but Bernie has been pull­ing in huge crowds - 36,000 in Los Ang­el­es last Sat­ur­day - on his "Fight Ol­ig­archy" tour.



Here's the age thing. He's accompanied on the tour by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, progressive Democrat serving as the U.S. representative for New York's 14th congressional district. She's 35. However, a big draw to the rallies has been the musical pairing of Neil Young and Joan Baez.



Neil's 79, Joan is 84, and Bernie himself is 83.

How come these oldies are front and centre of this protest campaign, the poster-boy and -girl faces, rather than thrusting young activists? Of course, they come from a counter-culture tradition, particularly Baez. A big echo for me of the time I spent in the USA in 1970, when we shut down the school I attended in protest after the Kent State killings, and I sat on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial at a Black Panther rally in Washington. Singing along to Country Joe McDonald (and the Fish) and his Vietnam Song - "And it's one, two, three, what are we fighting for?". Although they (Baez & Co) - and we - were dissidents then, and still are, I suppose that we were also the post-WWII generation that believed in the large institutions developed to provide the checks and balances against autocracy and future wars, the UN, ECHR, ICC - all challenged these days by the right ... Trump, Vance, Musk, Badenoch, Farage.

I find it remarkable that these three are still showing up, and being noticed. Having an effect, carrying a voice, far more than many sixty years younger. Recognised, and listened to, by Gen Z?

Alastair Campbell was asked by a listener on The Rest is Politics (TRIP) - Question Time yesterday - "he's a big fan, this one", winked Campbell - whether he thought that he and Stewart represented "old politics", i.e. by being liberal centrists in this age of populism, believers in rule-of-law while Musk takes his chainsaw to treasured institutions.

There has also been discussion on the TRIP podcast of the 27% of young people who would favour dictatorship over democracy, according to the youth poll carried out by Glasgow University's John Smith Centre.

So, I ask, is my left-leaning generation out of touch?

Donald Trump is 78.

Thursday 17th April

On Tuesday I had a small rant at Bezos and his priapic space indulgence as we witness the atrocities of Gaza. Thank-you, Ben Jennings, for giving us this picture:


Tuesday 15th April

Yes, a month without writing, worn down by the shitshow out there. Mostly inflicted by the modern oligarchs: Trump, Musk, Bezos and the rest. It is so hard to stomach their moral bankruptcy and obscene wealth as we witness the sufferings of Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan ... and anywhere else not on their "America First" priority list. Bezos sending a bunch of perma-tanned women into space in a dollar splurge that would alleviate so much suffering on earth. Pointless, self-promoting, vile.

So I'll go for light relief today.

My friend Aidan WhatsApped me this photo yesterday, captioned "The shortest diversion in the history of highway maintenance":



I responded with this, captioned "Shortest cycle lane in Stroud (UK?)":



It's real. I've cycled through it many times on the way to my fav­our­ite but­cher in Stone­house, on the Cainscross Road heading west out of Stroud where the buses stop for all the schools along that stretch.

The wackiest thing about this brief nod to cyclist safety is that it is repeated several times. The highways people were not content with having only one go at it. There are maybe 15 numbered bus stop bays (you can see the indication for "Bay n" at the bottom of the pic) and the markings are in the gaps between bays. Is that useful? Imagine that all the bays are full, like around 3:15pm. What's a cyclist meant to do?

There is one other feature that gets me about this lane. It's the slavish application of what must be the lane marking protocol which demands that you have a bike picture at the beginning and another at the end. A toggle: bike lane on/bike lane off. Really? At 15 miles an hour you're in the lane for a split-second. You surely don't need to be told that it's over. One pic in the middle would do, wouldn't it? But those are the rules for the council lane marker, woe betide he who dares to disobey.

Saturday 15th March


Friday 14th March

I've been mirroring this blog on Instagram for those who more read­ily go there than to a web­site. After I posted yest­er­day's moan about spend­ing too much time on Trump, an Insta­gram user rep­lied with the rec­omm­end­at­ion that I simp­ly stop, pay no fur­ther att­ent­ion. I'm con­sid­er­ing the idea. It's hard, diff­icult for those of us who are fasc­in­ated by what's going on in the world to turn away. And, in my def­ence, Trump is hav­ing a big im­pact on all our lives at the mom­ent, just as his mon­ster ego de­mands. So for to­day at least I'm go­ing risk even more scru­tiny of the blob and his chief crony.

Elon Musk, recently tearful in a Fox News interview, admits to "great difficulty" in managing the Department for Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside SpaceX, xAI and Tesla. Of course, I don't honestly know how he has felt about the tsunami of criticism and scorn that DOGE has generated, but I suspect he's a little taken aback. He thinks he's doing the right thing: "I'm just here trying to make government more efficient." He encourages us to take an look at what he's doing, openly: "We are actually trying to be as transparent as possible. All of our actions are maximally transparent. I don't know of a case where an organization has been more transparent than the DOGE organization."

So, have you accepted his offer and taken a look at the DOGE web­site (link at bot­tom of post)?

I've included screenshots of my own tour below. Click to enlarge any image, or zoom/pinch/squeeze/what­ever (you will def­in­ite­ly need to for some of the det­ail).

The site opens with "Latest Work", featuring items such as:

Click to enlarge

That's the end of another piece of wokery ;-)

The "Savings" menu gives the big picture. This is really what it's all about according to Musk and Trump. Others may argue that it's an assault on the needy and an intent to shrink the function of the state.

Click to enlarge

This section includes:

Click to enlarge

I don't fully understand the explanation here, but I guess it's an attempt to document with detail different areas of (curbed) expenditure ...

... like wasteful contracts ...

Click to enlarge

... and unnecessary property leases ...

Click to enlarge

So it goes on, with a similar "Payments" sect­ion showing a summ­ary of dis­burse­ments that will be dis­con­tin­ued.

There are also pages intended to describe in broad terms the size and cost of fed­er­al in­vest­ment.

Click to enlarge

Bureaucracy is the number one target. Here's the "Un­const­it­ut­ion­al­ity In­dex": "This is the num­ber of agency rules created by un­elect­ed bur­eau­crats for each law passed by Con­gress in 2024." Here's an ex­plan­at­ion of rules from Har­vard Law School:

"When Congress passes legislation, it often explicitly authorizes federal agencies to implement provisions of the law through rulemaking. While agency rulemaking authority comes from Congress, the president sets priorities for agencies, often through Executive Orders. An incoming administration decides which existing federal rules to target with recission or replacement and directs agencies on what new rulemakings to undertake.


"We expect the Trump administration to attempt to roll back many of the rules promulgated under the Biden administration."

Click to enlarge

In short, DOGE is asserting that the federal government is needlessly and unpatriotically schlerotic.

Right, enough, that's a taste of DOGE.

I wonder if you're thinking the same as I am.

I can't argue against the reduction of bur­eau­cracy, waste and fraud. I grudg­ing­ly have to ad­mire that they've taken on this chall­enge and app­laud the pres­ent­at­ion of res­ults in the public domain.

My two major concerns are approach and motive. Trump and Musk are both scattergun practitioners, they're prepared to shoot before working through all the angles. There is always a risk of collateral damage, often to the least wealthy and fortunate, who after all are not natural Trumpian buddies. You can also detect the wider political agenda in the targets of DOGE scrutiny, the wokerati and coastal elites, crooked Joe Biden's crowd.

Finally, is the website reportage to be trusted? Is it true and acc­ur­ate? Al­though MAGA has been pre­par­ing for years, as ev­id­enced in the Pro­ject 2025 doc­ument, this pres­id­ent­ial term is still very young. The speed of DOGE im­plem­ent­at­ion is blist­er­ing; can DOGE really have instigated such a volume of cases in so short a period? Or is it an­oth­er ach­ieve­ment to app­laud, head firmly over sick bag?

The DOGE website is here: Visit the DOGE website


Thursday 13th March

I worry that I'm in danger of giving Trump what he most craves - att­en­tion. A red-top head­line every day.

I'm also daily becoming more fearful of the "orange bullet", the pros­pect of a Trump­ian fix to two of the most in­tract­able prob­lems of to­day's world. There's a kind of cease­fire in Gaza. Zel­en­sky has ag­reed to at least the US con­cept of a pause with Russia. All since Trump re­claimed the top job. I'm baff­led by how things app­ear to fall for him, if that's how we can be­gin to view those events. How he would crow if we had res­ol­ut­ion, vomit in­duc­ing. [Just so you know, I'm clear­ly not against an end to the strife and loss, only mort­if­ied that the blob should be its arch­it­ect or cat­al­yst.]

From a man who seems to have no proper grasp of how a good rel­at­ion­ship looks. He tells us how well he gets on with despot X, how great is tyrant Y. I can only see these friend­ships as a fig­ment, a puff of self-del­usion.



I really can't say that I understand. Any of it. Are the world leaders who have knelt before the throne in the Oval Office diff­er­ent? I swear I see rab­bit-shock in their eyes. "What's going to hap­pen here? What will he say next? How can I res­pond? Help!"

Wednesday 12th March

Here's a post that unites the personal and the public.

As I've mentioned before in these pages, we attend a vigil for Gaza every Friday evening at 6pm in front of the Stroud Subscription Rooms.



As a spin-off from this we attended a history talk two weeks ago at the Nailsworth Quaker Meeting House titled "From Balfour to Gaza". I took my seat, looked at the speaker, into whom I had also bumped moments before outside the toilets, and thought, "I think I know this man."

Indeed, I did; it became clear when he introduced himself ... my friend Mike Scott-Bau­mann from St. John's Coll­ege, Cam­bridge, last en­count­ered 50-odd years ago. In the in­ter­ven­ing dec­ades Mike has taught hist­ory (for a long per­iod only just down the road at Wyc­liffe in Stone­house; I never knew) and is curr­ent­ly chair of the Exec­ut­ive Comm­ittee of the Bal­four Proj­ect, an org­an­is­at­ion which ack­now­ledges "Brit­ain's hist­or­ic and con­tin­uing res­pons­ib­il­it­ies, we work through ed­uc­at­ion and ad­voc­acy to ad­vance equal rights for Pal­est­in­ians and Israelis". You can visit its web­site here: Visit the Balfour Project website

The History Press, headquartered in Cheltenham, released his book in 2021, since updated:



We met for lunch yesterday and agreed that this pub­lic­at­ion could not have been better timed. I per­son­ally - that's why I was at his talk - have been try­ing hard to und­er­stand more of the back­ground of the pres­ent con­flict. I've read the first few pages of the copy Mike gave me and already feel better equipped.

Broadcaster Jon Snow has commented:

"This book is both necessary and accessible. So many people are myst­if­ied by this never-end­ing Middle East con­flict. Here at last is a con­cise and read­able acc­ount of a fund­a­men­tal in­ter­nat­ion­al issue of our time, one that has im­plic­at­ions far be­yond the reg­ion where it is set."

Tuesday 11th March

Reasons to be cheerful.

Well, at least some humour out of grim times.

I noticed the main story on the front page of the Daily Star on the Waitrose newspaper rack:



Says it all, doesn't it? Really gets to the heart of what drives the orange man-child in the White House. Miffed at Zelensky nipping in for the royal treatment before he gets his state visit. He just wants to feel chosen, ahead of all the rest, actually said the words in a TV interview, an instinctive moan. Now he suspects that Starmer and the King were just pulling his wire.

Then I find out that the lovely Lee Anderson is being tested as Chief Whip of Reform. The Ashfield thug struggles to maintain order among his single-digit band of colleagues.



Finally, Musk has taken a hit since the start of March.



I know, he's still not poor, and this may be a blip. Analysts say it might in part be due to a move from "automotive 'pure play' to diversification into AI and robotics" and suggest that this drop is "creating an attractive entry point for investors". But for the moment, most of us have enjoyed the graph trajectory.

Sunday 9th March

I couldn't let this pass by without a mention, as it's where this blog started nearly five years ago.

Today is (among other things):



The GOV.UK website explains here: About the Day of Reflection

National Covid Memorial Wall, opposite Houses of Parliament, London

I don't have to go far for my memories - because they're all here in these pages. I spent some time earlier running through what I wrote. Very weird - and of course tragic for many - times.

Here's one distressing observation. At certain points I've consigned Donald Trump to history. Now look where we are.

Friday 7th March

I find the news particularly overwhelming at the moment. Perhaps I watch, listen to and read too much of it, al­though I'd be at a loss were I not informed.

One contributing factor is the relentless output of the Orange Buff­oon. In­ev­it­able given his de­sire to be not­iced, to make a head­line every day.

So it was with pleasure and relief that I yest­er­day stumb­led upon an Insta­gram feed of Priv­ate Eye car­toons. I'll share one with you. It made me chuck­le, light­ly. It had noth­ing to do with any of the world's bad guys.



No Trump. No Vance. No Musk. Just funny.

Thursday 6th March

Governance by social media ... and press con­fer­ence, TV sound­bite, photo opp­or­tun­ity. Check out Trump's blast of last night. An ex­plic­it ex­ist­ent­ial threat - "if you don't do as I say" - to the "People of Gaza", direct from the leader of a dis­tant, over­whelm­ing­ly more pow­er­ful country, del­iv­er­ed via his "truth" platform.



This has gone viral. Some doubt about origin and attribution, looks like Banksy, signed Loretto. Valid nonetheless.


Wednesday 5th March

The commentators and columnists are struggling, the podcasters too. When I'm lost for words, I often turn to the cartoonists for help, post a handful of their takes. But there are simply too many after this last week.

I'll restrict myself to a couple.

Megan Herbert of Australia's The Age and Sydney Morning Herald has some handy detail in summary (click to enlarge):



David Sipress of The New Yorker shares the gloom of his pro­fess­ion­al col­leagues and (at least some of) his com­pat­riots:


Sunday 2nd March

The Mail on Sunday condemns Trump? Starmer gets a pat on the back? In the new world order, there's a surprise every day ...


Saturday 1st March

What would you expect from Truth Social?






Friday 28th February

You've probably seen this video, as it was shown on the BBC national news two nights ago (fact-checked by BBC Verify), The Guardian ran a piece yest­er­day, oth­er­wise ... viral ev­ery­where. I'm post­ing it here for the record.

Did Trump really put this out? I searched on Truth Social. Yes, it was there under his profile.

On how many levels is it wrong?



Surely no sane person can think like this. The President of the United States? Apart from anything else, would you really want to display pictures of your podgy self on a sun lounger?

You'd be justified in asking why I have any truck with X and Truth Social; I admit ... I have accounts with both. My defence is that I want to hear without filter from the horses' mouths, however bad their breath. I never post, just observe ... and let my jaw drop.

The outpourings of Trump on his platform stretch be­yond the out­er reach­es of my im­ag­in­at­ion. Over-the-top praise of his cabinet appointees, blunt dismissal of opponents. Copious self-con­grat­ul­at­ion. A del­uge of "wins" in his first month, more than any previous pre­sid­ent, he claims.



Click to enlarge

Of course, our Labour party could do with success stories, and we'd like to hear about them. Starmer's team appears to have none of Trump's knack of doing what he says, picking off low-hanging fruit, choosing targets that resonate with the electorate, and then telling us what he's done.

Thursday 27th February

Everybody's beating a path to Trump, to the Court of the Orange King. I don't envy them. It's a difficult act both to grovel and stand tall.

"I do deals. My whole life is deals. That's all I know, is deals."

If you're trying to get inside Trump's head, understanding the above is clearly one of the keys, particularly as he says it himself. Plus we should heed the old advice: "Follow the money" ... or real estate ... or rare earth. He always needs something in return, hates the idea of anybody getting the better of him, of being ripped off: Europe not paying its way in NATO (as he sees it), Ukraine sucking money out of Uncle Sam. Yet weirdly, and crucially, he only affords respect to those with power enough to take something from him too. Part of the turn-on of a deal is that it is by definition reciprocal. It's a both-way handshake. Big bad boys rubbing up against each other.

I've written in these pages about the "silver bullet" needed to resolve some of the world's intractable problems. In recent days, a shiver has passed through my body as I imagine a variant - the "orange bullet". What if Trump did unlock some world stalemates, do what many previous US presidents have failed to do? It's a primary part of the legacy he would like to build. He has certainly got people's attention and leaders are hopping to impress.

But what a thought. Indigestible.

I've mentioned Orwell in earlier posts. Can you think of a novel more prescient than 1984? The current Trump-Putin mini-entente doesn't quite fit, but the presence of three superpowers holds good. Driven by self-interest. The idea of global co-operation dashed, international institutions and altruism scorned. Subjective truth.


Thursday 6th February


Saturday 1st February

After the shock of Trump's first days as 47th president - four more years of this madness, really? - let me turn to another source of rage, the word that can still not be spoken in UK government quarters. Five years ago yesterday we left.



Gloom, anger and bewilderment have filled these pages on the topic in all that time (and more, nearly a decade), and yes, the damage has been immense, but I'm inclined to be more positive today. Here's what YouGov (sort of a horse's mouth) says:



It's maddening only to be reclaiming ground that we gave up voluntarily (that's right, 5% of GDP), but hey, at least we're heading back in the right direction, and some of the other half are coming to their senses. Starmer still can't say the word, but he clearly knows he has to be closer to Europe, or he can kiss goodbye to growth. How far might he go in another five years? Of course, that's a whole other debate, whether floundering Labour can pull themselves together enough to secure another term.



Here's the link to explore more detail on the YouGov site: YouGov: How do Britons feel about Brexit five years on?

Thursday 29th January

I'm chuffed that cartoonist Guy Venables has echoed my comments about Trump's take on opportunities in Gaza:



In yesterday's The Rest is Politics podcast, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart debated whether Trump could be called a fascist. Campbell drew our attention to a document, a poster allegedly once sold in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum shop in Wash­ing­ton DC, based on an article written by Laurence W. Britt in the bimonthly secular humanist journal Free Inquiry Magazine (Vol 22 no 2, 15 July 2003) titled "Fascism Anyone?". Britt had identified 14 common themes in seven regimes he examined: Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Pap­ad­op­oul­os's Greece, Pinochet's Chile and Suharto's Indonesia.



Campbell asked Stewart - and the listener - to match and grade each of these assertions against Trump's MAGA-unleashed USA, where 1 = 'not at all' and 10 = 'completely'.

What do you think? Useful in some, but not all, respects. I get that Campbell was trying to highlight unpleasant and dangerous aspects of Trump's intentions, but I'm not convinced that fascism is the right term, or that the 14 themes properly define fascism. Narcissism would be a more appropriate label for Trump himself, along with all his "art of the deal" trans­act­ion­al approach, the "look out for number one" or "what's in it for me?" instinct (both for Trump personally and the USA as a whole). He's too chaotic and obsessed with self to be defined by any -ism or recognised for any specific political ideology. He does however run counter to and distrusts most of the rule-of-law beliefs and institutions that the USA has developed and supported over many decades, the UN, WHO, ICJ and more, in all their wokeness. What most scares those of us brought up in the liberal tradition is the rejection and dismantling of forces for good, the collaborative stuff of a better world. And, of course, he is quite simply just horrid, creepy and repulsive.

Monday 27th January

Trump profile pictures on X

Yes, like most, I'm reeling from the Trump in­aug­ur­al on­slaught, the MAGA tsu­nami. Four years of getting ready to go on day one of his ret­urn, cel­eb­ra­ted on the White House web­site View Trump 100 hour actions:



From the hours of news bulletin and pod­cast, from yards of print co­ve­rage in the last week, one ob­ser­va­tion that has stood out for me came from Rory Stewart on The Rest is Pol­it­ics. He sug­gested that Trump was aim­ing to build a strong­hold in the Am­er­icas (with the incl­us­ion of the Pan­ama Canal, Can­ada ... and Green­land). Xi Jin­ping can do what he wants in the South China Sea and with Tai­wan, Putin can re-col­on­ise East­ern Europe and rest­ore the Russia of his youth.

A map imagined in 1949 comes to mind:



Although Trump is not advocating the Oc­ean­ia-Eur­asia-East­asia per­pet­ual war (he does­n't like to pay for it), dyst­op­ian days none­the­less. Maga­speak instead of Newspeak, ob­ject­ive truth ban­ished. As long as Trump's home patch is un­aff­ected or ben­ef­its, the post-WWII con­cerns of the rule of law, in­ter­nat­ion­al ag­ree­ments that fos­ter whole-world health and safe­ty (WHO, Paris, NATO) can go hang. The rest of the planet in­ter­ests him only where he can make a dime, strike a deal. He was asked last Mon­day if he thought the Gaza cease­fire would hold and com­ment­ed that beaut­iful things could be done there, it's on the sea, great wea­ther ... you could see him imag­in­ing the dev­el­op­ment of Trump hotels and golf courses, after he's moved every­body out to Egypt and Jordan.

Today is Holocaust Memorial Day. How app­ro­priate of in­aug­ur­al bud­dy Elon Musk to tweet this res­ponse to acc­us­at­ions of a fasc­ist sal­ute:



On Saturday Musk made a surprise video appear­ance at Ger­many's far-right Alt­er­nat­ive für Deutsch­land (AfD) el­ect­ion cam­paign rally.

Friday 24th January


Monday 20th January


Thursday 2nd January

I said on Tuesday that I no longer need to make those hard­core res­ol­ut­ions, as al­co­hol and to­bacco are things of the past. I can dream a bit more, light­ly, acc­ent­uate the positive. Here's a sample of my non-ex­haus­tive, un­ord­ered list:
  • Contact a friend ('phone, message, email, send a postcard ...) every day.
  • Invite acquaintances, like people I know by sight in the street, to join me for a cup of tea and a conversation, with the intention of getting to know them better.
  • Have lunch with my sister at least every other month.
  • Plan long weekend breaks to European cities I have not yet visited.
  • Visit my cousins.
  • Go up to Minchinhampton Common regularly to hack a golf ball around and witness the big skies.
  • Organise day trips to interesting places within striking distance.
  • Cook something new every week.
  • Walk in a Gloucestershire beauty spot once a week.
  • Build and maintain my own events diary (aggregated from local media, newsletters and websites) for Stroud.
My hope is that if I do some of these I'll be encouraged to tack­le the mun­dane crap that I must also add­ress, the things I'm prone to avoid.

Others may have different plans (click to enlarge):

Click to enlarge

That's the tricky part, isn't it? We have to put up with all of those above.

Wednesday 1st January



© Charlie Lewis 2025
Email: charlie_c_lewis@hotmail.com